INGLIZ AKADEMIK DISKURSIDA GRAMMATIK KONSTRUKSIYALARNING SUBYEKTIVLIKNI IFODALASHDAGI ROLI
Keywords:
grammatik konstruksiyalar, akademik diskurs, subyektivlik, modallik, majhul nisbat, kishilik olmoshlari, funksional grammatika, diskursiv strategiyaAbstract
Maqolada ingliz akademik diskursida grammatik konstruksiyalarning subyektivlik ifodalashdagi funksional-semantik xususiyatlari
tahlil qilinadi. Grammatik vositalarning tipologik tasnifi yaratilgan va ularning pragmatik vazifalari aniqlangan.
References
1. Biber D., Finegan E. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical
marking of evidentiality and affect. – Text, 1989. – Vol. 9(1). – P. 93-124.
2. Chafe W. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing //
Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology / Ed. W. Chafe, J. Nichols. –
Norwood: Ablex, 1986. – P. 261-272.
3. Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. –
London: Longman, 1995. – P. 265.
4. Givón T. Functionalism and grammar. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1995. –
P. 486.
5. Halliday M. A. K. An introduction to functional grammar. – London: Edward
Arnold, 1994. – P. 387.
6. Huddleston R., Pullum G. K. The Cambridge grammar of the English language.
– Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. – P. 1842.
7. Hyland K. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic
discourse. – Discourse Studies, 2005. – Vol. 7(2). – P. 173-192.
8. Langacker R. W. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical
prerequisites. – Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987. – P. 516.
9. Palmer F. R. Mood and modality. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2001. – P. 236.
10.Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. A comprehensive grammar of
the English language. – London: Longman, 1985. – P. 1779.
11.Leech G. Principles of pragmatics. – London: Longman, 1983. – P. 250.
12.Sinclair J. Corpus, concordance, collocation. – Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1991. – P. 179.
